QuickSwap V3 (Manta) Review: Zero‑Fee DEX on Manta Network

When you hear "zero‑fee DEX" you might think it’s a hype claim, but QuickSwap V3 Manta review shows a real deployment that actually waives taker and maker fees. Built on the privacy‑focused Manta Network, this version of QuickSwap extends the Uniswap V3‑inspired AMM model into a new ecosystem while keeping transaction costs at 0.00%.

What is QuickSwap V3 (Manta)?

QuickSwap V3 (Manta) is a decentralized exchange (DEX) that runs on the Manta Network, a layer‑1 blockchain that emphasizes zero‑knowledge privacy and high throughput. The platform inherits the core architecture of Uniswap V3-concentrated liquidity, price‑range orders, and automated market making-but adapts it for Manta’s native token standards and privacy layer.

Unlike the original QuickSwap on Polygon, the Manta deployment operates without any regulatory oversight, meaning users bear full responsibility for compliance and security.

Zero‑Fee Structure and How It Stacks Up

QuickSwap V3 (Manta) advertises a flat 0.00% fee for both makers and takers. To put that into perspective, here’s a quick comparison:

The zero‑fee model makes quick arbitrage and high‑frequency swaps more viable, but it also means liquidity providers (LPs) earn only the protocol’s native token incentives instead of transaction fees.

Concentrated Liquidity Explained

At its core, QuickSwap V3 (Manta) uses the Automated Market Maker (AMM) model pioneered by Uniswap. What sets it apart is concentrated liquidity, a system that lets LPs allocate capital to specific price ranges rather than the entire curve.

Benefits include higher capital efficiency and deeper order books within chosen price bands. Risks involve impermanent loss if the market price drifts outside your selected range, which can erode earnings faster than in a traditional AMM.

For active LPs, tools like Gamma-integrated in early 2023-automate range adjustments, helping mitigate loss while chasing optimal yields.

Getting Started: Wallets and Bridge Mechanics

Because the exchange lives on Manta Network, you need a compatible wallet that supports its privacy‑preserving addresses. Supported options include Brave Wallet, Metamask with custom RPC, and the native Manta Wallet app. After setting up the wallet, you’ll typically use a cross‑chain bridge (often powered by Squid x Axelar) to move ERC‑20 tokens from Ethereum or Polygon onto Manta.

• Install a supported wallet and add the Manta RPC endpoint.
• Fund the wallet with MANTA or any ERC‑20 you plan to swap.
• Use the bridge UI, select source chain, target chain (Manta), and token amount.
• Confirm the transaction and wait for finality-Manta’s block time averages under 5 seconds.

Once assets land on Manta, they appear as native ERC‑20 tokens on the network, ready for swapping or liquidity provision.

Token Ecosystem: QUICK and MANTA

The platform’s governance revolves around the QUICK token. Holders can vote on protocol upgrades, fee‑distribution changes, and liquidity mining programs. QUICK also serves as a reward for LPs, offsetting the zero‑fee environment.

On the broader network side, the MANTA token is the native utility token of Manta Network. As of late 2024 it trades around $0.20 with a market cap near $88million. A healthy MANTA price generally correlates with higher DEX activity because users need the token for gas and bridging fees.

Both tokens are listed on major aggregators, but liquidity depth on the Manta deployment remains thin compared to the Polygon counterpart.

Market Position and User Adoption

QuickSwap’s main Polygon site pulls roughly 186k organic visits per month, a solid traffic base. The Manta deployment, however, lacks publicly available analytics, suggesting it’s still in a growth phase. FxVerify reports zero user reviews and a 0‑star rating for the Manta version-either because it’s brand‑new or because the community hasn’t formed yet.

From a competitive standpoint, the DEX sits in a crowded layer‑2 and privacy‑focused niche. Its zero‑fee advantage can attract arbitrage bots, while the concentrated liquidity model appeals to sophisticated traders seeking higher returns on modest capital.

Pros, Cons, and Quick Checklist

• Pros:
  • Zero transaction fees eliminate cost barriers.
  • Concentrated liquidity offers higher capital efficiency.
  • Integration with Gamma and SquidxAxelar simplifies LP management and cross‑chain moves.
  • Privacy‑preserving Manta Network may attract users wary of on‑chain transparency.
• Cons:
  • Liquidity pools are shallow; large trades can cause slippage.
  • No fee revenue for LPs means reliance on QUICK rewards, which can be volatile.
  • Limited community feedback and support resources.
  • Unregulated environment places full compliance responsibility on users.

Future Outlook

QuickSwap’s multi‑chain strategy suggests it will keep supporting emerging networks like Manta as long as the ecosystem shows growth. Manta’s roadmap includes further privacy upgrades and scaling solutions that could deepen DEX liquidity. Meanwhile, QuickSwap’s governance roadmaps hint at upcoming features such as limit orders, dTWAP trading, and “QuickPerps” derivatives-features that could later be ported to the Manta deployment.

Price forecasts for the MANTA token point to a modest rise toward $0.22 by the end of 2025. If that trajectory holds, gas costs on the network will stay low, encouraging more users to experiment with the zero‑fee DEX.

In short, QuickSwap V3 (Manta) offers a compelling proof‑of‑concept for fee‑free trading on a privacy‑first chain, but it still needs a stronger liquidity base and community support to become a go‑to destination for everyday traders.